Africa:
Year of Action for AIDS Treatment?
AfricaFocus
Bulletin
Jan 9, 2005 (050109)
(Reposted from sources cited below)
Editor's
Note
"The
Indian Ocean tsunami killed 150,000, and triggered
a remarkable global relief effort that has raised
$4 billion for the stricken region. But AIDS, tuberculosis,
and malaria alone kill 40 times that number every
year, taking no fewer than 6 million lives. And
still, the United Nations must scramble for the
$3 billion a year it needs to combat these diseases."
- Toronto Star, January 8, 2005
The
torrent of pledges in response to the uniquely visible
natural disaster in the Indian Ocean is a testimony
to human solidarity as well as to the power of today's
global media. Contributions include not only the
well-publicized responses from rich countries, but
also less-noticed contributions from countries and
regions themselves burdened with pressing humanitarian
needs. [For a summary of the response from Africa
to the Tsunami disaster, including $100,000 contributions
from Mozambique and from the African Union, see
the January 5 article from the Afrol independent
news agency (http://www.afrol.com/articles/15136).]
While
the tsunami toll continues to mount, the focus is
now less on pledges than on ensuring that pledged
resources are turned into action. And commentators
are also beginning to raise other fundamental questions.
Most significantly, can the response to the tsunami
be carried over to even more devastating crises
that are less photogenic, such as AIDS, global health,
conflict, and poverty? Or will the effect be to
reduce resources for implementing programs that
have not been scaled up for lack of political will
and resources?
This
AfricaFocus Bulletin contains two articles from
a year-end special by the UN's Plusnews highlighting
the current status of antiretroviral treatment in
Africa, an overview and a report from Mozambique.
While the scale of the AIDS pandemic differs significantly
from one African country to another (see http://www.africafocus.org/docs04/hiv0412a.php),
for the worst affected countries the impact of AIDS
alone is orders of magnitude greater than the toll
inflicted by the tsunami on all the countries involved.
Despite
significant expansion of programs in the last two
years, only four percent of the estimated 3.8 million
people in need of such treatment in Africa now have
access..Global spending on HIV/AIDS in low and middle-income
countries was estimated at $6.1 billion in 2004,
with the need projected at $12 billion for 2005.
The
year began with Nelson Mandela's courageous statement
acknowledging that the death of his son was due
to AIDS, and calling on others to speak out as an
indispensable step to countering the disease. The
articles below indicate that while the obstacles
of political will and resources are still formidable,
the basic outlines of what needs to be done are
in place.
++++++++++++++++++++++end
editor's note+++++++++++++++++++++++
Africa:
the Aids Treatment Era - Introduction
UN
Integrated Regional Information Networks
http://www.irinnews.org/
December
31, 2004
Johannesburg
[Excerpts.
For full text and additional articles, see the PlusNews
Special at http://www.plusnews.org/webspecials/ARV/default.asp]
As
a result of falling antiretroviral (ARV) prices,
new sources of international funding and growing
political commitment, providing treatment for Africa's
HIV-positive citizens is, for the first time, an
achievable goal.
In
sub-Saharan 3.8 million people need treatment now,
but as of June 2004, only 150,000 were on ARVs -
less than four percent of that total. The remaining
96 percent - those parents, workers, lovers and
children denied access to the life-prolonging drugs
- will, unless there is urgent intervention, inevitably
join the other 30 million people worldwide that
the pandemic has claimed.
Picking
up the Gauntlet
The
enormity of the challenge is daunting for a continent
that, over the past two decades, has witnessed the
attrition of public services and the deepening of
poverty. Even Africa's targets under the World Health
Organisation's '3 by 5' initiative - three million
people in the developing world on antiretroviral
therapy (ART) by the end of 2005 - seem incredibly
ambitious.
But,
although little more than pilot programmes in many
countries, the rollout of antiretroviral treatment
(ART) is underway, and lessons are being learnt
on the job. "I genuinely believe [3 by 5] is still
within reach, and that the momentum is picking up
at country level. I don't want to pretend it's going
to be easy, though - it's going to be very tough,"
Stephen Lewis, the UN Special Envoy on HIV/AIDS
in Africa, told IRIN.
What
it takes to deliver ART is already well understood,
much of it as a result of the pioneering work of
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in South Africa and
Malawi. It involves standardised treatment protocols
and simplified clinical monitoring; the delegation
of aspects of care and follow-up to more junior
healthcare workers and the community; the involvement
of community members and people living with AIDS
in programme design; and ensuring a reliable supply
of affordable medicines and diagnostics.
The
delivery platform for national programmes is the
overburdened and under-resourced public health system,
whose decline has been accelerated by the toll of
HIV/AIDS. In Malawi, more than half of all government
health posts are vacant and, according to a report
by the Regional Network for Equity Health in Southern
Africa (EQUINET), 90 percent of public health facilities
do not have the capacity to deliver even a minimum
healthcare package.
Under
such conditions, "without urgent measures to recruit
and retain healthcare workers, coupled with a system-strengthening
perspective, the public health response to HIV/AIDS
will be delivered at the expense of public health
in general," the EQUINET report noted. [For this
and other Equinet reports, see http://www.equinetafrica.org/]
WHO
acknowledges that "major new investment in countries'
health systems" will be needed - an additional 100,000
health and community workers for a start. It estimates
that the cost of achieving 3 by 5 will be US $5.5
billion, but points to the ongoing mobilisation
of international finance, and the lasting benefits
that well-managed increased spending on ART will
have on public healthcare in general.
Given
Prime Minister Tony Blair's commitment to driving
the AIDS agenda forward, both Lewis and South African
treatment campaigner Zackie Achmat highlighted in
interviews with IRIN the significance of Britain's
chairmanship of the G8 and European Union in 2005.
...
Build
it and They Will Come?
But
where ART is available, stigma, seemingly inexplicably,
still influences people's response to treatment.
...
The
Infectious Disease Care Clinic at Botswana's Princess
Marina hospital in the capital, Gaborone, is one
of the biggest treatment sites in the world. Many
patients travel long distances to get there because
of the anonymity the facility provides. Many also
arrive sick beyond recovery because they have waited
too long to seek treatment, even though Botswana
has a well-publicised, amply funded, model ART programme.
It
is not just rural people that succumb to stigma.
Vodacom, one of South Africa's largest mobile phone
companies, has a free treatment programme, but few
workers are reportedly accessing it. "Professional
relationships still convey a danger of rejection,
especially in contexts of conflict or competition",
suggested the BMJ article.
ART
should be part of a continuum of care: a comprehensive
approach that includes voluntary counselling and
testing, prevention of mother-to-child transmission,
and other prevention and social support services.
A regular supply of drugs, treatment preparedness
and literacy are important factors in achieving
high and sustained adherence rates. ...
Not
Everybody Wins
A
mix of payment systems - free, subsidised or self-paying
- are employed by governments, and criteria for
access to ART differ widely. What is increasingly
clear, however, is the inequity in access, even
when the drugs are free.
"Given
their limited access to income and other productive
resources, women are less likely to be able to participate
in self-pay schemes, even with subsidised prices,"
a report by the US-based Centre for Health and Gender
Equity noted.
"Many
families cannot afford to have more than one person
on ARVs because of the financial implications, so
if there is one person that should go on the drugs,
it is usually the man, because as the perceived
head of household, he is less dispensable," Karana
Mutibila of Zambia's Network of People Living with
AIDS told IRIN.
Because
of the additional cost of paediatric ARVs, and the
difficulty of calculating the correct dose when
using adult ARVs, HIV-positive children are another
group that are often sidelined by existing ART.
ARVs
represent only around 50 percent of the costs of
treatment. In Zambia, CD4 count, viral load, liver
function, syphilis and TB are just some of the tests
required before ART can start - and they are not
free. "People can go to and fro for three weeks
[taking tests] before treatment starts, and many
of them give up," said Zulu.
A
study in Senegal found that when the cost of drugs
for opportunistic infections, laboratory exams,
consultations and hospitalisation fees are calculated,
patients on ART pay an additional US $130 a year
- a significant amount for the majority of people
who live on less than a dollar a day, and a reason
cited for treatment interruptions.
The
"Freeby5" campaign (http://www.nu.ac.za/heard/free/freeby5.asp)
argues that any form of payment disadvantages the
poor, while exemption systems are not cost-effective.
The signatories to the declaration note that a "prerequisite
for ensuring that treatment programmes are scaled
up, equitable and efficient, and provide quality
care, is to implement universally free access to
a minimum medical package, including ARVs, through
the public healthcare system".
The
unfortunate reality is that not everybody who needs
treatment will be able to access it - but if you
are rich and live in the cities, you stand a better
chance. "What we can look forward to is some treatment,
for some people, in some settings," said professor
Alan Whiteside at the Health Economics and HIV/AIDS
Research Division of the University of KwaZulu-Natal,
South Africa. ...
"People
in the north consider that they have a compact with
their governments, which entitles them to a certain
level of treatment when they are sick. I don't think
that's true in the developing world: if you don't
think you are entitled to it, or expect to have
it, you die uncomplainingly. This epidemic provides
room for building civil society [as a political
movement around treatment]," Whiteside told IRIN.
Overview
- Focus on Mozambique
Mozambique
is a catalogue of the problems that poor countries
face when they expand antiretroviral therapy (ART).
National
HIV prevalence in 2004 is projected to be 14.9 percent
among people aged 15 to 49, based on sentinel surveillance
by the ministry of health and the National Institute
for Statistics. The average hides sharp disparities
between provinces, ranging from 26.5 percent in
Sofala to 8 percent in Nampula. Provinces bordering
South Africa, Zimbabwe and Malawi are the worst
affected.
Among
the estimated 1.4 million people infected, 218,000
need treatment in 2004, according a National Institute
of Statistics study.As of November 2004, 5,900 people
were on ART: 4,200 through NGOs, 1,200 at Maputo
Central Hospital, a few hundred at provincial sites,
and about 50 through private health care.
The
goal was to have just under 8,000 people on ART
by the end of 2004, with an annual increase to 20,800,
58,000, and 96,000 - reaching 132,000 in 2008.
Healthcare
Providers
The
first problem is lack of human resources. There
are 800 doctors, 300 of them expatriates, in a population
of 18.9 million. This means one doctor for every
24,000 people, against one per 5,000 to 10,000 recommended
by the World Health Organisation. The 11,000 nurses
represent one per 1,700 people, while WHO recommends
one every 300.
Healthcare
is also unevenly spread: 80 percent of doctors are
in Maputo, the capital; among all health staff,
those in the provinces have the lowest qualifications.
Due
to AIDS-related deaths, Mozambique needs to train
25 percent more doctors and nurses every year just
to maintain the existing low levels of staffing,
says a study by the ministry of health.
The
University Eduardo Mondlane, the new National Health
Institute in Maputo, and the new Nursing School
in Beira are increasing student uptake, but to retain
them in the country after graduation will require
better salaries and working conditions. Meanwhile,
with donor money to offer monthly salaries of US
$3,000, the government is recruiting 120 doctors
in Cuba and India.
Infrastructure
Another
problem is poor health infrastructure. In the provinces,
sub-standard facilities and lack of basic equipment
is common. Many of the 27 rural general hospitals
operate below minimum acceptable standards, says
the Health Sector Strategic Plan 2002-2005.
To
enable ART, the Italian Catholic NGO, Communita
de Santo Egidio, rehabilitated three molecular laboratories
with state-of-the art equipment. The biggest, at
Maputo's Central Hospital, cost US $450,000; those
in Maputo and Beira are operational, and Nampula
will open soon to serve the northern region.
In
the meantime, blood samples are sent weekly from
the north to Maputo by courier airplane - run-down
inter-provincial roads make some airfreight unavoidable.
The
lab in Maputo offers training for health personnel
from Mozambique and other African countries where
Santo Egidio plans to start ART.
At
Maputo Central Hospital, Brazilian cooperation funds
ARV training for doctors and nurses, and to date
200 doctors have been trained, so that every province
now has ARV-competent doctors.
Dr
Rui Bastos is the Mozambican training coordinator.
"We are overworked," he says. "We lack diagnosis
capacity, drugs for opportunistic infections, nurses,
psychologists and resources in general." ...
Treatment
Providers
Two
NGOs, Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) and Santo Egidio,
run model community-based care and treatment projects:
MSF treats 1,700 patients in Maputo and Lichinga;
Santo Egidio runs 13 sites in Maputo and Beira,
treating 2,500 patients.
By
2007 Santo Egidio plans to treat 8,400 persons at
20 sites in five provinces.
In
Maputo, MSF is working at full capacity. Its clinic
there has 1,500 patients on ART and a waiting list
of 1,000. "It is frustrating, but our human and
financial resources are limited," says MSF general
coordinator Patrick Wieland.
MSF
employs 20 medical staff in Maputo, including two
Mozambican and three foreign doctors, and 10 non-medical
staff. The total annual cost of the programme is
$2.5 million, but, being donor-dependent, MSF can
only guarantee five years of treatment, and continuation
hinges on additional funding. Patients must understand
this, sign consent forms, and hope.
"It
is not our role to treat everyone," says Wieland.
"We showed ART is feasible; we can train others,
but we cannot substitute for the government."
Santo
Egidio operates on a different model, at a lower
annual cost of $2.2 million. The Catholic charity
relies on volunteers from Italy and other countries,
who pay their travel to Mozambique during holidays
and work one month for free at its sites.
The
annual treatment cost per patient at Santo Egidio
is $700, broken down to $300 for generic antiretrovirals
(ARVs) and $400 for tests and other support.
The
success of such ART programmes in Mozambique and
elsewhere in Africa lies in strong community involvement
regarding patient identification, selection, care,
support and monitoring. It is labour and capital
intensive.
Besides
drugs and tests, patients need good food, clean
water and a healthy environment; mothers need formula
for babies. Santo Egidio distributes food, insecticide-treated
mosquito nets, water filters and home-based care
kits, while MSF has partners who provide this support.
Can
these schemes be replicated by the public health
sector?
"As
it is, no," says Wieland. "Local solutions are needed
- there is no other choice."
Gabriella
Bortolot, coordinator at Santo Egidio, says: "We
can't export a western model to Africa, but the
challenge is to develop an African model of quality
care."
Local
solutions include using non-medical personnel at
all levels. Lay community workers, trained and supported
by referral systems, can run pharmacies, do routine
follow-up, counselling, and home or palliative care;
nurses and clinical officers can offer prescription
and consultation, while community health workers
can monitor patients for toxicity and clinical failure,
freeing scarce doctors to attend mainly to complications.
Eliminating
the requirement for viral load and CD4 counts before
starting treatment bypasses expensive tests.
Expansion
Mozambique
began planning nationwide ART in 2002 with a degree
of reluctance: health authorities knew first-hand
the problems involved. "AIDS should not detract
from other health services, it should reinforce
them," says Dr Mouzinho Saidi of the National Programme
to Fight HIV/AIDS.
The
examples of successful ART schemes run by NGOs helped
dissolve the initial reluctance, but today the government
is under pressure from activists and donors alike
to expand treatment access.
"We
are resisting donor pressure to increase the numbers
because we want to grow in a sustainable way," says
Saidi. "If we lose control, drugs will end up [being]
sold on the streets and patients will not be properly
monitored." The fear of creating resistant strains
of the virus is palpable, as is the fear of donor
funds shrinking in the future. ...
The
ethical imperative and the practical feasibility
of ART in Africa are now widely accepted. The challenge
is at what pace and how.
"Scaling-up
was decided by donors in foreign capitals, who don't
know the on-the-ground reality of treating patients,"
says Wieland. "Westerners like to do a lot quickly,
and have quick impact, but we need long-term strategies
to sustain results, not relying on donors and their
whims."
Coordination
Throughout
the interview with PlusNews, Saidi stressed one
point: coordination. "We can't have disorganised
growth or parallel systems for treatment, drug procurement
and drug supply," he explained.
Mozambique,
like other developing countries, has a variety of
health care providers, including the state, NGOs,
churches and the private sector. ART began in Mozambique
with NGOs; the public health sector came later.
The challenge is to coordinate the whole spectrum
of ART providers. ...
Donor
Dependency
In
UNDP's Human Development Index, Mozambique ranks
at 171 out of 177 countries. In 2003 its GNI per
capita was US $210, compared to an average of $450
in sub-Saharan Africa.
In
2000 foreign aid accounted for 70 percent of all
spending on health, 46 percent of education expenditure
and 75 percent of the funds spent on infrastructure,
such as roads and water.
In
1999 foreign aid provided 52 percent of the $100
million health budget, notes the Health Sector Strategic
Plan. With increased foreign funding for AIDS, the
ratio is higher today.
Mozambique
is one of the most donor-dependent countries in
the world, and its treatment plan echoes this. The
government worries about the long-term sustainability
of treatment, and the recent wrangle among donors
about next year's financial support for the Global
Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria feeds these concerns.
Then
you meet Ana Maria Muhai, 43, a dynamic activist
in Machava on the outskirts of Maputo. Her miner
husband returned from South Africa in 1998 with
a retrenchment bonus and promptly left her and their
three young children when she became sick.
In
February 2002, Muhai, weighing 29 kg, ravaged by
opportunistic infections, bald, with horrible skin
rashes and a bad cough, arrived at the clinic. In
three weeks ARVs brought her back from the brink
of death.
Today,
a healthy Muhai helps patients with treatment adherence.
When some ask if she is paid by the Italians to
say she is HIV positive, she pulls out an old photo.
"Then they see it is for real - I know it is not
a cure, but I feel cured," she says.
There
are 1.4 million people like Ana Maria Muhai in Mozambique,
whose contribution to family, community and nation
is unique, irreplaceable, and threatened by the
virus.
AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic
publication providing reposted commentary and analysis
on African issues, with a particular focus on U.S.
and international policies. AfricaFocus Bulletin
is edited by William Minter.
AfricaFocus
Bulletin can be reached at africafocus@igc.org. Please
write to this address to subscribe or unsubscribe
to the bulletin, or to suggest material for inclusion.
For more information about reposted material, please
contact directly the original source mentioned.
For a full archive and other resources, see http://www.africafocus.org/