
What
The Zambian Government Won’t Say…
By Zarina Geloo
LUSAKA (PANOS FEATURES) – Zambia’s
Minister of Health Brian Chituwo recently boasted that 6,000 out of
a targeted 10,000 people living with AIDS, have accessed the government’s
cheap anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs since a roll-out began last August.
What he does not mention is that even though women make up the majority
of people living with AIDS in this southern African country, they constitute
less than 10 per cent of those accessing ARV drugs.
Last year,
with much fanfare, the government made available more than $2 million
for the purchase of ARV drugs for 10,000 people. The Central Board of
Health says there are about two million people who have HIV/AIDS in
Zambia, 70 percent of them women. The National AIDS Council (NAC), which
monitors ARV provision says as of March 2004, there were only 800 women
on these life-prolonging AIDS drugs.

NAC Acting
National Director Dr Alan Simwaanza says the drugs are available to
both men and woman – “I don’t know why women are not accessing them,”
he says.
Nkandu
Luo, former health minister knows why.
“Women
are not being specially targeted. As usual all the activity is focused
on men. Why don’t medical people insist that a man brings his wife when
he is being given the ARVs?”
She says
wives of infected men must also be tested to see whether they too need
to go on these drugs. “We demand to test the other partner when a person
shows up with a sexually transmitted disease – why don’t we do the same
for ARVs?” she asks.
Luo, a
medical scientist specialising in AIDS, says there has been no systematic
attempt to inform women about HIV/AIDS or even encourage them to go
for testing and take ARVs if they need to. Even those few women who
are accessing ARVs are in the cities and towns – very few turn up at
the rural health centres. In the rural town of Mazabuka, for instance,
of the 160 people on treatment only seven are women.
“Even
though they can see the statistics no one is doing anything about it.
It’s like as long as people (whether its men or women) are taking the
drugs, than the job is done,” Luo says.
She suggests
that clinics should have special days or areas for women who have tested
HIV-positive so they are not intimidated and can discuss their treatment
freely.
Goliath
Mumbuna, who is on ARVs says it is too expensive to have his wife on
treatment. He was referring to the $8 a month that government clinics
and hospitals charge for ARV treatment – expensive in a country where
80 per cent of the population live on a dollar day or less. Before the
government’s ARV roll-out last August, combination AIDS therapy would
typically cost about $65 a month.
Unemployed
Mumbuna says even buying his own supply of ARVs is a problem, so his
son has to “scrape around”.
Alines
Ngoma, a nurse and traditional marriage counsellor, gets to the root
of the problem. It’s tradition and custom that are to blame, she says:
“A woman is a being of sacrifice. To be considered a model wife and
mother she must put the well-being of her husband and children first.”
Ngoma
says what Mumbuna is not saying: that when it came to the crunch, it
was he who had first-call on the family’s resources even though it is
his wife, Agnes, a tomato seller who actually is the bread-winner. “It’s
culture and historically, culture has always disadvantaged the woman,
so why should this be any different?”
Agnes
agrees with her but for different reasons: “I was scared of being accused
that I killed my husband or that I was a witch if I went on the ARVs
and my husband did not. As it is, women are blamed for HIV in the home,
so it is better he goes on the ARVs alone.”
Agnes
cannot even ask her relatives to buy the drugs for her because the fact
that both she and her husband have HIV is still a secret. “My husband
would kill me if it ever leaked.” Nor can she use the profits from her
small business to buy drugs because that is the money she uses to feed
her family.
“The guilt
if my family went without food would kill me faster than AIDS. I can
never spend family income on myself.”
Their
son says he has left it up to his parents to decide which one would
go on the drugs. He had hoped it would be his mother because she has
a lower CD4 count and is often ill, but he “understands” her reasons.
Mary Bweupe
says her husband got his relatives to buy him the drugs and told her
to do the same with her own relatives. “He told me it was more important
for him to survive and look after the children. In effect, he was saying
I was dispensable.”
“He knows
I am an orphan and there is no one to buy the drugs for me. So while
I would like to go on treatment, I can’t. So I will just live like this
by the grace of God.”
There
are exceptions. Bismart Mugala makes sure his wife eats with him and
they both take their medicines on time. The days are hard for them,
and sometimes there isn’t enough money to buy the drugs. But there is
never a question of one of them stopping.
“It never
occurred to me that only I should go on treatment. I never thought like
that. We both need the treatment. I know I gave my wife the virus, so
it’s up to me to make sure she gets treatment.
“I am
amazed that men should allow that their wives to sacrifice themselves
in such a manner.”
Apart
from the cost of ARVs, there is also the treatment regime, which is
not without cost. Patients have to drink a lot of water and eat three
balanced meals a day. Only 30 per cent of Zambians have access to clean
and safe drinking water. Piped water is usually a two km-trek.
For Saraphina
Muleba this simple fact meant she could not continue with her medication.
“I walk
long distances to get water – if I have to make more trips it means
I have no time for my work in the home and my family will complain.”
As far as food is concerned, like many Zambians her family eats one
meal a day. She stopped treatment because she felt worse after taking
her medication on an empty stomach.
When it
comes to husband Nebat, however, every effort is made to ensure that
he eats “something” with his tablets and gets clean water.
Nebat
says it’s up to his wife to take care of herself: “She is the mother
of this home; she knows what to do. If she does not take care of herself
and only cares for me.. well, what can I do? I cannot force her.”
This angers
nurse Brenda Manda, who says women should get rid of their beast-of-
burden disposition. “We are human, flesh and blood, we get sick and
need to maintain our health just like men. We should say ‘no’ to this
unfair sacrifice.”
She says
women are reticent about demanding things for themselves, even though
they will go through hell to ensure their families are fed and well.
She points
to one of her patients, whose husband has refused to pay for her ARVs.
“He says he can pay for treatment for a certain period, but if it is
life-long, he would rather divorce her as she would be expensive to
maintain. Because he is the bread earner, he does not see his treatment
as an expense.”
It’s not
just the cost of ARVs that is hindering women’s access: a game of power
has begun in some homes. Janet Illonga left her husband – and ARV treatment
– when he beat her up once too often.
“From
the time I went on ARVs he physically and emotionally abused me. I took
it for a while but then the beatings got worse. He was killing me slowly
anyway so there was not much point in staying in his home just because
of the drugs.”
Her relatives
are poor and while they would have been able to buy her drugs for a
couple of months, it was unlikely that they could have continued life-long
treatment. So she has given up and prays for the best.
A mother
of three daughters, Illonga says that rather than “look for money” for
ARVs, she will fight for money to ensure her daughters are educated
and financially secure. “I don’t want them to end up like me – infected
through no fault of my own and helpless to do anything about it.”/PANOS
FEATURES
Zarina
Geloo is a Zambian freelance journalist.
top
If
you have difficulty reading this e-Newletter
CLICK
HERE
to read it on-line |